|
A GP20/20 Committee was
formed to respond to the County Draft Environmental Impact Report, which
is due in late August 2009
|
For more information and
additional upcoming
meetings, please visit
the Calendar on the
General Plan Update
Web site.
|
November 2011 Update
On 9/29/11 the
DPLU responded the PMPO with County
recommendations to the 2020 Plan, based on
inputs to the County
Click to see the
DPLU letter
The
County recommendations were not aligned with
the PMPO recommendations submitted on
11/14/09
Click to see the
PMPO Letter
The
PMPO Responded to the DPLU on 10/15/11
Click to see the
PMPO Letter
and a follow-up email to the
Board from the Board Chair
Click to see the
Message
The
Board held a Conference Call with the DPLU
on 11/7/11, to discuss the variance between
the recommendations,
here is the DPLU
Response
Follow this link to see the Official Maps
(North Mountain)
http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/advance/FCI.html
Table of Rural
Commercial designations
|
Area
|
Existing
Designation
|
PMPO Recommendation
11/14/09
|
Updated DPLU
Recommendation
11/10/2011
|
Response/Action
|
|
Summit
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No Issue
|
|
Helipad
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No Issue
The DPLU included the Helipad area and
the Nance/White Parcels to Rural Commercial
designation
|
|
Woods Property
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No Issue
|
|
Group Camp
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
This is
National Forest Service federal land with a
Public Agency land designation, the DPLU
does not have jurisdiction over this land
PMPO
Board voted and agreed not to pursue this
change with the Federal Government at this
time
|
|
Fire Station
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No Issue
|
|
Adjoining Properties to the Fire Station
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
The 2 Triangular
Parcels East of the Fire Station are <25%
Slope, therefore do not meet the county
guidelines for rural commercial designation
The 2
Rectangular Parcels North of the Fire
Station
The Burlingame
property (North East Parcel) is <25% Slope
and is landlocked, therefore does not meet
the county guidelines for rural commercial
designation
The Rice property
(North West Parcel) is approximately half
<25% Slope and landlocked, therefore does
not meet the county guidelines for rural
commercial designation
PMPO Board voted
and agreed to accept the DPLU Recommendation
on these Parcels
|
Item 2 Lot Size
The DPLU have recommended
changing the density for the area along State Park
Road, the Summit to the St Park (30 parcels) to
10:1, the Pre-FCI status was 8:1 which does not
exist as a density option now
Michael Walsh will contact
the DPLU to further discuss the Density for the
other areas on the Mountain than the area along
State Park Road, the Summit to the St Park (30
parcels)
Minutes
Meeting 07/05/09
Meeting 07/12/09
Meeting 07/26/09
Report to PMPO Board 8/22/09
Other Documents
PMPO 11/14/09 Submission (to the County)
EIR
Summary (from the County)
Rural Commercial Map
Density Map
EIR Memo Chair:
Bruce Graves
Members: Terri Bailey, Elizabeth Getzoff, Cecelia Borland, Gordon
Madison, Alan Serry, Susan Humason |
